In My Defense...
- Jul 28
- 4 min read
A leader recently came to me frustrated, not exactly with her team, but with herself. She had been noticing a pattern in her meetings. When certain team members pushed back on her ideas or decisions, she felt an almost immediate internal pull to defend herself. To explain. To justify. To make sure everyone in the room understood why she was right.
And she didn't like how it felt - or how she was reacting.
To be clear, the issue wasn't the pushback itself. She valued her team's perspective. She genuinely wanted people who would challenge ideas and bring different points of view to the table. That part she had built intentionally. The issue was one particular team member whose expression of disagreement consistently activated something in her.
The tone.The timing.The delivery.
Something about it hit a nerve, and before she could think clearly, she was already in defense mode.
Reactive. Guarded. Not her best self. She knew it wasn't serving her. She just didn't know how to stop it.
What's Actually Happening in That Moment
When we feel challenged, especially in front of others and especially in a role where our credibility feels visible, the nervous system responds before the brain catches up. It's not a character flaw. It's biology.
The perceived threat triggers a protective response. And for many leaders, that response shows up as defensiveness. A rush to explain, justify, or counter before the other person has even finished their thought.
The problem isn't that the feeling arrives. Feelings arrive. That's human.
The problem is when the feeling drives the response, and the leader ends up reacting to the way something was said instead of engaging thoughtfully with what was said.
Defensiveness, even when justified in the moment, rarely lands well. It can signal insecurity. It can shut down the very dialogue the leader was trying to create. And it almost always escalates the tension rather than resolving it.
The Paraphrase Pause
One of the most effective strategies for interrupting the defensive reflex is deceptively simple. Before you respond, paraphrase.
Not to agree.Not to concede.Simply to reflect back what you heard, in your own words, before you say anything else
"So what I'm hearing you say is…"
"It sounds like your concern is…"
"Let me make sure I understand, you're saying…"
This one move does several things simultaneously.
Paraphrasing buys time. That pause between hearing something and responding to it is where clarity lives. It's where the reactive brain settles enough for the thoughtful brain to take over.
Paraphrasing signals curiosity. When you paraphrase before you counter, you communicate that you actually heard the person, that their point of view was worth taking in before you responded to it. That signal alone can change the entire temperature of the room.
Paraphrasing turns down the intensity. Both yours and theirs. When someone feels heard, they often soften. And when you've taken the time to reflect back what they said, you've also given yourself a moment to move from reaction to response.
Paraphrasing keeps you curious. Defensiveness closes the door. Paraphrasing holds it open, long enough to consider that there might be something worth hearing in the pushback, even if the delivery left something to be desired.
Separating the Message from the Delivery
This is the harder and more important skill underneath all of it. When someone's tone, timing, or delivery activates us, it becomes very easy to dismiss the content along with the style. We stop hearing what they're saying because we're too busy reacting to how they're saying it.
Self-aware leaders learn to do both at once: internally note that the delivery wasn't ideal and still stay open to whether the substance has merit.
These are two separate conversations. One is about the idea on the table. The other is about how disagreement gets expressed on the team - and that conversation matters too, but it doesn't belong in the middle of the moment. It belongs in a quieter, separate space where it can actually land.
In the meeting, stay with the message. After the meeting, if the delivery is a pattern worth addressing, address it.
Reflection Questions
When I feel challenged in front of others, what is my default response: curiosity or defense?
Are there specific people or styles of communication that consistently activate my defensive reflex?
How often do I paraphrase before I respond, and what might shift if I did it more intentionally?
Am I reacting to how someone is communicating, and missing what they're actually trying to say?
Defensiveness is almost always a signal worth getting curious about. It often points to something we care deeply about, our credibility, our judgment, our leadership. Those things matter. But protecting them in the moment rarely works as well as we hope.
The pause does more than the defense ever will.
You matter. Especially when you choose curiosity over protection, even when everything in you wants to explain.
Culture, communication, trauma-responsive leadership — this is the work I do through keynotes, workshops, and coaching. If it's on your mind for your team, let's talk.



